ILC-2011-SC-CRL-Feb-3
Arup Bhuyan Vs. State of Assam
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 25
Cannot be read literally violates Article 19,21 of Constitution - Conviction - Confession to police officer - Inadmissible - Admissible under TADA - Member of banned organization - Not make a person -Criminal - Unless - Resorts to violence - Incites people - Create public disorder -By violence - Appeals allowed - Direction to release on bail.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Markandey Katju , Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Gyan Sudha Misra ,
Vijay Hansaria, Sr. Advocate, Aseem Mehrotra, Abhijat P. Medh, Advocates with him
Avijit Roy (for M/s. Corporate Law Group), Advocate
Topic(s)-
Important Decision(s)- Evidence Act, 1872 S. 25 - Confession to police officer - Inadmissible - Admissible under TADA Direction to release on bail.
ILC-2014-SC-CRL-Apr-3
A.T. Prakashan Vs. Excise Inspector & Anr.
ILC-2014-SC-CRL-Apr-2
Vinod Kumar Vs. State of Kerala
ILC-2014-SC-CRL-Apr-1
Babubhai Bhimabhai Bokhiria & Anr. Vs. State of Gujarat & Ors.
ILC-2014-SC-CRL-Mar-21
Navneet Kaur Vs. State of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
ILC-2014-SC-CRL-Mar-20
State of Bihar & Ors. Vs. Rajmangal Ram
ILC-2014-SC-CRL-Mar-19
B. Jayaraj Vs. State of A.P.
ILC-2014-SC-CRL-Mar-18
In Re: Indian Woman says gang-raped on orders of Village Court published in Business & Financial News dated 23.01.2024
ILC-2014-SC-CRL-Mar-17
Sanghian Pandian Rajkumar Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr.
ILC-2014-SC-CRL-Mar-16
Vijay Dhanuka Etc. Vs. Najima Mamtaj Etc.
ILC-2014-SC-CRL-Mar-15
Homi Rajvansh Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors.