Civil Law
Mode of Citation- ILC-2017-SC-CIVIL-....
Get started with Indian Law Cases
Your password will be generated automatically and will be sent to your email-id provided in this form.
Full Name  
Email ID
(this email-id will be treated as your User ID also)
Address
City
Mobile No
* Mobile No is required for verification of identity
 Bare Acts  | Legal Resources  | Lawyer Locater  | Articles  | Legal Dictionary  | Download Desktop Software  | Subscription   Home   |   E-Journal  |  Sign-In  | Contact Us  | Disclaimers

Civil Law
 Search Tips
Civil Law
Mode of Citation- ILC-2017-SC-CIVIL-....
Judgement Subject Index/Important Decision/Topic

ILC-2011-SC-CIVIL-Jan-8

Hari Ram Vs. Jyoti Prasad & another

Head Note

The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908  - Order I Rule (8) , The Limitation Act, 1963  - Section 23

Maintainability of the suit - Suit for permanent injunction - Allegation that defendant encroached upon substantial part of the disputed street - Trial Court decreeing the suit directing the removal of unauthorized construction from the ground - Defendants further restrained from raising any further construction in future on the aforesaid street - Decree passed by Trial Court affirmed by the First Appellate Court and High Court - High Court holding that suit not barred by limitation as an encroachment on public street is a continuing wrong and there exists a continuing cause of action - Appeal against - Plea of non-compliance of the provisions of Order I Rule 8 CPC raised by defendant - Suit filed by an aggrieved person whose right to use public street was prejudicially affected - Since affected person himself has filed the suit, the suit cannot be dismissed for alleged non-compliance of provisions of Order I Rule 8 CPC - Evidence on record showing that defendant encroached upon the suit property consisting of the public street - Decree passed by trial Court confirmed - Appeal dismissed.

Advocates For the Respondent(s) :

Jasbir Singh Malik, Ms. Ekta Kadian, Devender Kumar Sharma

click here unfaithful spouse why are women unfaithful
abortion clinics in orange county ru486 what happens after an abortion
spy a phone tracking app for android android apps that spy on you
apps free android spyware on android phones sms spy apps
antibiotics to treat chlamydia chlamydia and gonorrhea symptoms chlamydia in the mouth symptoms
antibiotics to treat chlamydia symptoms of gonorrhea chlamydia in the mouth symptoms
treatments of hiv/aids how to prevent hiv/aids hiv aids transmission
how to know if wife has cheated why women cheat with married men married woman wants cheat
android sms spy app how to install spyware on android best free android spyware
abortion in islam at home abortion methods dilation & curettage
abortion pill nyc does insurance cover abortion teen pregnancy
std home test kits at home std kits chlamydia testing for men
android free spy app cell spy monitoring software free android monitoring app
abortion stories regret suction abortion abortions in las vegas

Topic(s)-Maintainability of the suit

Important Decision(s)- Non-compliance Order I Rule 8 CPC not fatal when affected person himself filed the suit.







Full Judgement Body


     
@2016 Indian Law
Name  
Email ID
Please Wait..