Land Acquisition
Mode of Citation- ILC-2015-SC-LA-....
Get started with Indian Law Cases
Your password will be generated automatically and will be sent to your email-id provided in this form.
Full Name
Email ID
(this email-id will be treated as your User ID also)
Address
City
Mobile No
* Mobile No is required for verification of identity
 Bare Acts  | Legal Resources  | Lawyer Locater  | Articles  | Legal Dictionary  | Download Ticker  | Subscription   Home   |   E-Journal  |  Sign-In  | Contact Us  | Disclaimers

Land Acquisition
 Search Tips
Land Acquisition
Mode of Citation- ILC-2015-SC-LA-....
Judgement Subject Index/Important Decision/Topic

ILC-2012-SC-LA-Sep-1

V. Chandrasekaran Vs. Administrative Officer

The Land Acquisition Act, 1894  - Acquisition of Lands

Land once vested in the Government - whether can be divested? - Held - Once the land is acquired and it vests in the State, free from all encumbrances, it is not the concern of the land owner, whether the land is being used for the purpose for which it was acquired or for any other purpose. He becomes persona non-grata once the land vests in the State. He has a right to only receive compensation for the same, unless the acquisition proceeding is itself challenged. The State neither has the requisite power to reconvey the land to the person-interested, nor can such person claim any right of restitution on any ground, whatsoever, unless there is some statutory amendment to this effect.

The Land Acquisition Act, 1894  - Section 4 , Section 5-A , Section 6 , Section 16 , Section 17 (2)

The acquisition challenged by one - whether others can also take the benefit of the same? - Held - In the event that the person interested has not filed objections in response to a notice issued under Section 5-A, and has not challenged the acquisition proceedings, the quashing of the declaration issued under Section 6 in some other case, would not enure any benefit to such person. More so, where the possession of land has already been taken, and such land stands vested in the State, free from all encumbrances as provided under Sections 16 and 17(2) of the Act, prior to the date of decision of the Court quashing the declaration in toto, no benefit can be taken by him. Where a party has not filed objections to the notice issued under Section 5-A, the declaration qua such persons is generally neither quashed, nor does it stand vitiated qua him, by any error of law warranting interference. There is also another view with respect to this matter, which is that, in case the said land has been acquired for a Scheme, which does not fall within the ambit of "public purpose" then,in such a case, it would not be a case of acquisition under the Act, instead, it would amount to colourable exercise of power.

The Land Acquisition Act, 1894  - Section 4

Whether subsequent purchaser can challenge the acquisition proceedings? - Held - A person who purchases land subsequent to the issuance of a Section 4 notification with respect to it, is not competent to challenge the validity of the acquisition proceedings on any ground whatsoever, for the reason that the sale deed executed in his favour does not confer upon him, any title and at the most he can claim compensation on the basis of his vendor's title.

Topic(s)-







                                                                          Full Judgement Body is not available


@2014 Indian Law

Our Ventures
Name
Email ID
Please Wait..