Enercon (India) Ltd. & Ors. Vs. Enercon Gmbh & Anr.
|
Head Note
The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 45
Section 45 - Application filed by the respondents for reference of the dispute to arbitration under Section 45 has been correctly allowed by the Appellate Court as well as by the High Court - All the disputes arising between the parties in relation to the following agreements viz. SHA, TKHA, SSHAs and STKHA, Agreed Principles and IPLA, including the controversy as to whether IPLA is a concluded contract are referred to the Arbitral Tribunal for adjudication - Keeping in view the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case and the inordinate delay which has been caused due to the extremely convoluted and complicated proceedings indulged in by the parties, it is appropriate to name the third arbitrator - The Respondents are restrained from proceeding with any of the actions the details of which have been given in the judgment of Eder, J. dated 23rd March, 2012 and the order dated 27th March, 2012 as well as the judgment of Justice Cooke dated 30th November, 2012 - The respondents are also restrained from approaching the English Courts for seeking any declaration/relief/clarification and/or to institute any proceedings that may result in delaying or otherwise affect the constitution of the arbitral tribunal and its proceedings thereafter.
Topic(s)-