Karam Kaur Vs. Jalandhar Improvement Trust & Ors.
|
Head Note
The Limitation Act, 1963 - Section 5 , The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Order XXII Rule (3) , Section 151
After 7 years of death, and after dismissal of second appeal, these petitions have come with out furnishing sufficient reasons - High court dismissed all and Apex court held that Her plea that she was told by her husband that counsel would inform about the hearing of the application, cannot be a ground to entertain the application for condonation of delay of more than seven years for preferring the petition for substitution and her plea that she is only person to be substituted due to family settlement not tenable as earlier it was not brought before the court when substitute petition was filed by proforma defendants and which was later withdraw as not pressed.
Topic(s)-Condonation of Delay