Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee Vs. Bannama (D) by LRs.
|
Head Note
The Transfer of Property Act, 1872 - Section 43
Doctrine of feeding the estoppel - Mother is the owner - But son sold the property to the appellant - Pending case first son died and his legal heirs brought on record- next the mother /plaintiff died leaving grand children as her legal heirs - The Appellant now took the shelter of Sec.43 of T.P. Act - Apex court held that We have, therefore, no doubt in our mind that in a case where a transferor never acquired by succession, inheritance or otherwise any interest in the property during his life time then the provision of Section 43 will not come into operation as against the heirs who succeeded the stridhan property of their grandmother.we do not find any merit in this appeal, which is accordingly dismissed.
Topic(s)-Doctrine of Feeding the Estoppel