Full Name		Full Name is required
Email ID		Email ID required Invalid Email is ID
(this email-id will be treated as your User ID also)
Address
City		City required
Mobile No		Mobile No is required Invalid Mobile No
	* Mobile No is required for verification of identity

Head Note

Indian Penal Code,1860  - Section 121 , Section 124 , Section 120-B

Chhattisgarh Jansuraksha Adhiniyam, s. 8 (1) (2) (3) - Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, ss. 10, 13 - Conduit - Arrest - Bail - Rejection - Sustainability - Case was registered against appellants u/ss. 121, 124(1), 120B IPC and u/ss. 10 and 13 of the 1967 Act and u/s. 8(1) (2) (3) of the Adhiniyam - Appellants were arrested and denied bail by Trial Court - HC also rejected the bail applications of appellants and HC held that direct evidence was available against appellants showing their complicity, there was a prima facie evidence against appellants - Hence instant appeal - Whether appellants would be enlarged on bail - Held, both appellants were on bail with the condition that they would not enter the State of during the period - Other two accused persons have already been granted bail - Charges are yet to be framed - Appellants deserve to be enlarged on bail during the pendency of trial - SC ordered that it would be subject to the condition that appellants should report to the concerned police station once a week - Appeals disposed of.

Topic(s)-Bail – Naxalite – Granted with conditions