Taiyo Membrane Corporation Pty. Ltd. Vs. Shapoorji Pallonji & Co. Ltd.
|
Head Note
The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 11 (6)
Arbitration - Appointment of Arbitrator - Contention on behalf of the respondent that there is some confusion with regard to the description of the parties in the sub-agreements hence application u/s 11(6) not maintainable repelled - Held that the Court does not find any ambiguity or inconsistency in the description of parties so as to non-suit the applicantpetitioner by dismissing its application on the above basis - The ambiguity, if any, in the description of the parties having been explained and the respondent Company itself having issued L.O.Is. and having exchanged subsequent correspondences with the applicant with regard to the works under the subcontracts - A former Judge of the Supreme Court appointed as Arbitrator.
Topic(s)-Arbitration - Appointment of Arbitrator - Appointed ,