Laxmidevamma & Ors. Vs. Ranganath & Ors.
|
Head Note
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Section 100
Second Appeal - Concurrent Findings of Fact - Substantial Question of Law - Suit for declaration and possession - Based on oral and documentary evidence, both the courts below have recorded concurrent findings of fact that plaintiffs have established their right in 'A' schedule property - No substantial questions of law arose in the High Court and there was no substantial ground for re-appreciation of evidence - Unless the findings so recorded are shown to be perverse - Judgment of the High Court cannot be sustained and the same liable to be set aside and the judgment passed by the restored.
Topic(s)-Second Appeal - Concurrent Findings of Fact - Substantial Question of Law