Civil Law
Mode of Citation- ILC-2016-SC-CIVIL-....
Get started with Indian Law Cases
Your password will be generated automatically and will be sent to your email-id provided in this form.
Full Name
Email ID
(this email-id will be treated as your User ID also)
Address
City
Mobile No
* Mobile No is required for verification of identity
 Bare Acts  | Legal Resources  | Lawyer Locater  | Articles  | Legal Dictionary  | Download Desktop Software  | Subscription   Home   |   E-Journal  |  Sign-In  | Contact Us  | Disclaimers

Civil Law
 Search Tips
Civil Law
Mode of Citation- ILC-2016-SC-CIVIL-....
Judgement Subject Index/Important Decision/Topic

ILC-2015-SC-CIVIL-Sep-7

Ram Niranjan Kajaria Vs. Sheo Prakash Kajaria and Others

Head Note

The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908  - Order VI Rule (17)

Amendment of Pleading - Admission - Withdrawal of - Held that a categorical admission made in the pleadings cannot be permitted to be withdrawn by way of an amendment - However, the admission can be clarified or explained by way of amendment and the basis of admission can be attacked in a substantive proceedings.

The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908  - Order VI Rule (17)

Amendment of Pleading - Written statement - Admission - Withdrawal of - Delay of 25 years - Held that delay in itself may not be crucial on an application for amendment in a written statement, be it for introduction of a new fact or for explanation or clarification of an admission or for taking an alternate position -Issues have been framed in the case only in 2009 - Nature and character of the amendment and the other circumstances are relevant while considering the delay and its consequence on the application for amendment - But a party cannot be permitted to wholly withdraw the admission in the pleadings.

The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908  - Order VI Rule (17)

Amendment of Pleadings - Admission - Withdrawal of - Partition suit - Application for amendment withdrawing the admissions made in the written statement on relinquishment of the claim to the suit property by Defendant Nos. 5 and 12 liable to be rejected -In the facts and circumstances of the case Defendant Nos. 5 and 12 given an opportunity to explain/clarify the admissions made in the written statement - Defendant Nos. 5 and 12 permitted to file an application within one month limiting their prayer only to the extent of explaining/clarifying the disputed admissions in the written statement which will be considered on its merits and in the light of the observations made herein.

Topic(s)-Amendment of Pleadings - Admission - Withdrawal of - Partition suit - Amendment rejected







Full Judgement Body


     
@2015 Indian Law
Name
Email ID
Please Wait..