Chaitanya Prakash Audichya Vs. CBI
|
Head Note
Prevention of Corruption Act,1988 - Section 7 , Section 13 (1) , (2)
Corruption - Conviction - Appeal against conviction - Illegal gratification - Trap case - Versions of PW1 and PW2 are completely consistent establishing the basic ingredients of demand and acceptance - Tainted currency notes were found on the person of the appellant - Explanation given by him soon after the incident through his letter dated 10.06.2024 is completely different from the theory put forth while the appellant examined himself as DW2 - Demand and acceptance thus not only stand fully established but the presumption invocable under Section 20 of the Act also stood unrebutted - Judgment and order of the trial Court convicting the appellant affirmed.
Topic(s)-Corruption - Conviction