Simar
 Bare Acts  | Legal Resources  | Lawyer Locater  | Articles  | Legal Dictionary  | Download Ticker  | Subscription   Home   |   E-Journal  |  Sign-In  | Contact Us  | Disclaimers

Civil Law
 Search Tips
Civil Law
Mode of Citation- ILC-2015-SC-CIVIL-....
Judgement Subject Index/Important Decision/Topic

ILC-2014-SC-CIVIL-Mar-2

Malathi Das (Retd.) Now P.B. Mahishy & Ors. Vs. Suresh & Ors.

Contempt Petitions  - Contempt of Court

Contempt - This appeal is against the order dated 26.03.2024 passed by the High Court of Karnataka - By the aforesaid order, after holding the appellants, prima facie, guilty of commission of contempt has granted them two weeks time to comply with the order in respect of which disobedience has been alleged failing which the matter was directed to be posted for framing of charge - 445 daily rated employees of the State serving in different departments, including the 74 respondents herein, had instituted W.P. Nos. 39117-176/1999 claiming regularization of service. By order dated 15.12.1999, the High Court following an earlier order dated 10.9.2023 passed in similar writ petitions i.e. W.P. Nos. 33541-571/98 etc. had granted the relief(s) claimed by the writ petitioners-respondents - The aforesaid order dated 15.12.2023 of the learned Single Judge was affirmed by order dated 24.01.2024 passed in the writ appeals filed by the State - 161 persons who had filed contempt proceedings for noncompliance of the order dated 15.12.2023 were regularized on 29.12.2023 - Thereafter, on 8.3.2006, 64 other persons, who were similarly placed to the aforesaid 161 persons as well as to the present 74 respondents, were also regularized - Such regularization was made without the concerned persons having to initiate any contempt proceeding - The Hon'ble Supreme Court does not hold them liable for contempt but make it clear that the appellants and all the other competent authorities of the State will now be obliged and duty bound to regularize the services of the respondents (74 in number) which will now be done forthwith and in any case within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this order.

BENCH :

Advocates For the Appellant(s) :

Topic(s)-Contempt







Login and Download Full Judgement Body
 
 
User Id
Password
 
Latest Update in Civil Law

ILC-2015-SC-CIVIL-Feb-4

Indian Bank vs. Manilal Govindji Khona

ILC-2015-SC-CIVIL-Feb-3

Construction & Design Service Vs. Delhi Development Authority

ILC-2015-SC-CIVIL-Feb-2

Subhas Datta vs. Union of india and Ors.

ILC-2015-SC-CIVIL-Feb-1

Defence Estate Officer vs. Syed Abdul Saleem and others

ILC-2015-SC-CIVIL-Jan-19

Mount Mary Enterprises Vs. Jivratna Medi Treat Pvt. Ltd.

ILC-2015-SC-CIVIL-Jan-18

Karnail Kaur & Ors. Vs. State of Punjab & Ors.

ILC-2015-SC-CIVIL-Jan-17

Delhi State Indus. Dev. Corpn. Vs. Ashok Kumar Madan

ILC-2015-SC-CIVIL-Jan-16

Kuldeep Kumar Dubey & Ors. Vs. Ramesh Chandra Goyal (D) Th Lrs.

ILC-2015-SC-CIVIL-Jan-15

Laxmidevamma & Ors. Vs. Ranganath & Ors.

ILC-2015-SC-CIVIL-Jan-14

Kulbir Singh Vs. State of Haryana



@2014 Indian law
Name
Email ID
Please Wait..